Rocky Mountain Research Station Logo USDA Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Research Station
Forestry Sciences Laboratory - Moscow, Idaho
Moscow Personnel  |  Site Index  |  Site Map  |  Moscow Home
Project Information  |  Modeling Software  |  Library  |  Project Photos  |  Offsite Links  |  Eng. Home

Soil & Water
Engineering Publications


Project Leader:
William J. Elliot
email Bill

Contact Webmaster
email webmaster

Database updated
860 days ago

Photogrammetric and rillmeter techniques for hydraulic measurement in soil erosion studies

Elliot, W.J.; Laflen, J.M.; Thomas, A.W.; Kohl, K.D. 1997. Photogrammetric and Rillmeter techniques for Hydraulic Measurement in Soil Erosion Studies. ASAE Paper No. 89-2621.

Keywords: WEPP, Rainfall simulation, Rill erosion, Research methods, photogrammetry

Links:

Abstract: To estimate the rill erodibility of a soil, it is necessary to relate observed erosion rates to the hydraulic shear and width of the rill channel. The hydraulic shear can be calculated given the hydraulic radius for a given flow condition. To find eroding rill channel hydraulic radii, photogrammetric and rillmeter methods were used in the Water Erosion Prediction Project cropland erodibility study conducted by the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. The objectives of this document are to describe two methods of measuring the rill shape on experimental sites and to compare the resulting rill shape parameter values. The photogrammetric method showed larger measurements for hydraulic radii, with greater scatter, but allowed for the collection of more topographic data, and had greater flexibility than the rillmeter method. For the rillmeter method, the mean hydraulic radii varied from 6.2 to 14.3 mm with a 95% confidence interval of +/-4.0 mm. For the photogrammetric method, the hydraulic radii varied from 10.2 to 25.6 mm with a 95% confidence limit of +/-9.4 mm. We concluded that for a study of this scope, the photogrammetric technology with the capability of providing considerably more site data is the preferred method. We also concluded that a rillmeter backup is desirable, rather than relying on a single measurement technology.

Moscow FSL publication no. 1997b